China and the Flow of Knowledge.

https://hyeong-chun.blogspot.com/search?q=%EA%B0%95%ED%9D%AC%EC%A0%9C

https://hyeong-chun.blogspot.com/search?q=%EB%93%B1%EC%86%8C%ED%8F%89+%EA%B5%90%EC%9C%A1

https://hyeong-chun.blogspot.com/search?q=%EC%A4%91%EA%B5%AD+%EA%B5%90%EC%9C%A1%EA%B0%9C%ED%98%81

Emperor Kang Hui-je(Aisin Gioro Hiowan yei), Deng Xiaopyeong, and Zhou Enlai considered it very important to open up and educate knowledge, including science and technology. They achieved the achievements that brought Qing and now China to their heyday. Even now, many developing countries are building advanced countries in the same way.

 

Behind the U.S.-China conflict is the conflict between the U.S., which has a creative background of knowledge, and China, which has embraced scientific and technological knowledge in Western society in an overly active way. Sometimes the United States defines China as a spy state. As Japan did in the past, China benefits a lot from actively embracing science and technology led by the state. The U.S., which cannot control it in unison on the basis of a liberal system, also has no choice but to take various measures on this issue.

 

Due to the first globalization, the North became industrialized and the South was excluded from industrialization. The second globalization reversed the situation 180 degrees. Twenty years ago, the number of jobs in the manufacturing sector and the share of value added fell sharply in the North, which was called an "developed country." At the same time, manufacturing output surged in six developing countries called I6, namely China, Korea, Indonesia and Poland.

 

- Midterm Omission -

 

During the 'miracle 20 years', Japan's manufacturing output expanded rapidly, which eventually led to rapid growth in gross income. This rapid growth eventually led to a massive conflict with the United States.

 

- [ THE GREAT CONVERGENCE ] by Richard Boldwin -

Double translation

 

China's political system has a deformed system of communist politics and capitalist economy, which may be a necessary way to adapt to the reality of China. The country born of the communist revolution must have taken a transitional approach because it had to endure the shock of another revolution in order to rapidly change its political system. The reason why Deng Xiaopyeong opposed the reform at the time of Tiananmen Square is thought to have been based on such an insight into the reality. However, China, which is strengthening its nationalist ideology rather than the idea of human prosperity together, predicts many conflicts with the outside world.

 

Given the country's long-term future, North Korea should be more open to knowledge and technology. Investment in education should be valued like Deng Xiaopyeong and Zhou Enlai. The importance of educational reform is greater than that of China, as North Korea has long been in military politics