It was surprising that even if there were occasional grotesque political acts in Korea, the country was still holding out without collapsing. The reason is that the system, which was composed of public consensus, has stabilized to some extent in the history of short but intense democratization.
The reason why the Qing Dynasty in China failed is that a chaotic (unsystemized) religious group demanded social reform of the Qing Dynasty, adding to the confusion of the Qing Dynasty. The Qing Dynasty collapsed due to the rebellion of the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom or the rebellion of the White Lotus, and after much chaos, the present People's Republic was established.
Emperor's reign Russia was destroyed by the self-fulfilling prophecy of a monstrous monk named Rasputin, and a huge an evil spirit called communism took Rasputin's place and disrupted the world.
The reason why dictatorships are more unstable than democratized countries is that power can be devastated by ideology or religion, or by using ideology or religion.
People like me are passionately defending these issues and trying to solve them. And I'm talking about the unification of the Korean Peninsula. But I couldn't help but worry that something would happen that would assimilate while hating about it. I sometimes feel embarrassed while critiquing the grotesques despite the fact that it is a serious issue. This is due to the fact that ideological disputes have grown in a sordid manner. Everyone is aware that capitalism is gradually becoming a monster under the pretext of standing up to communism.
The biggest problem facing autocratic countries is whether the spirit of the ruler can stabilize the national system and lead to national development. Singapore's Lee Kuan Yew administration or the Park Chung-hee administration in the first half faithfully performed the role of the system, similar to the system created by national consensus. However, those in power who lack capacity choose the silly and simple path of mobilization of materials, throwing their country and the world into turmoil. Although the ruler of China or Russia plays such a role, there are times when the ruler of a liberal democratic state is also tempted.
Young North Korean President Kim Jong-un must strive for rational political action even though it is difficult. The United States is not always right, but it becomes a stable system in the long run because the irrational behavior of a person in power is evaluated by elections. Korea's system is frequently attacked by grotesques, but it is also stabilized by elections. In order for the system to be stabilized in a liberal democracy, national education must be done well.
World War III is essentially a new form of war, and what Harris called the honorary state's war against the traditional nation-state. Electrical engineers would think of this situation as an impedance mismatch (a difference in the degree of disturbance in the flow of current at the place where electronic circuits of different nature are connected, so energy cannot be transferred efficiently).
Although one system is ordered by another, both systems operate according to completely different business principles and rules.
[ MOOD MATTERS ] by John L.Casti
A stable political leader stabilizes the system and leads to peace and development in the order of the country and the world.
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기