The cow and parliamentary cabinet system.

A farmer was climbing a mountain path in a truck when he saw a precious old lady coming down quickly in a luxury car. The farmer shouted loudly. Cow! Then the lady responded. Pig! And as soon as she turned the corner of the mountain, her car collided with a giant cow.

 

It is a humor I saw in a foreign magazine when I was a student, and it contains ideological misunderstandings and biases.

 

A few years ago, there was an article introducing a Korean haunted house on the Internet. The article introduced Cheong Wa Dae, where the president lives, as a haunted house. It was also true that the fate of Korean presidents was often tragic. This is all due to ideological problems.

 

South Korea's presidential system has a tradition of a new and powerful presidential system after a long military government. Some presidents take advantage of their strong authority to take care of their personal interests, and some presidents were unexpectedly promoted and unintentionally thought of themselves as kings, which broke down. Behind it was the prejudice and exaggeration of the people who sprinted into ideology.

 

It is possible to have an objective view because I have long observed the negative effects of ideological problems, but most people exaggerate and leap the issue by linking it to ideology if the president's policy failure, the people's health is bad, or the people have social discontent. Looking at people at the bottom of society and Internet comments are full of hatred from ideological thinking. The reason why the Korean-style presidential system is intertwined with the unreasonable word of political retaliation, not policy issues, is because the unreasonable word of ideology is based on collective thinking

 

These days, someone has come up with an opinion on reforming the presidential system into a parliamentary cabinet. A strong presidential system was needed in an era when civic awareness was lacking, but it seems that it is time to reform the ruling presidential system into a parliamentary cabinet system in the era when the generation with civic awareness slowly emerges as the mainstream of society. Or it would be better to introduce a two-way government system like Finland. The dual-government system is to operate state affairs under the parliamentary cabinet system in ordinary times, and to operate state affairs under the presidential system in case of an emergency.

 

The reality is that behind the confrontation between progressives and conservatives, there is a struggle for royal rights, and ideology was becoming a means of struggle for royal power.