Comprehensive Perspectives and Inner circle

Last summer, I got a book called "THE RULES OF WAR" that was not translated into Korean and read it. A writer called SEAN McFATE, a retired U.S. military officer who is active as a mercenary, emphasized the need to cultivate U.S. mercenary troops in a brave style. The logic was that modern wars have more non-regular wars using mercenaries than all-out wars, and the United States only loses wars because it cannot respond to wars of that nature.

 

https://hyeong-chun.blogspot.com/search?q=the+new+rules+of+war

So far, the author's logic has been right.

 

The author was persuading that it would be possible to train mercenaries or non-regular soldiers with a budget much less than the budget to introduce expensive weapons such as aircraft carriers and stealth bombers. The author's logic was persuasive, and I once expressed the logic of concern that there would be significant human rights violations due to the collapse of minimal war etiquette due to the activation of non-regular or mercenary warfare.

 

And at that time, I habitually developed and viewed economics. And from an economic point of view, the point was that the US strategic weapons industry is closely related to the US national economy, that is, the private economy. It becomes a comprehensive perspective if you think of it as the logic that many major modern full-scale wars were caused by economic motives and that the defense industry is driving the private economy.

 

Usually, members of an inner circle strive sincerely for the development of their group, but it is also important to have a comprehensive perspective of the upper group. The will of the state is formed by coordinating the opinions of the group and the group, and the will of the state and the state are coordinated to form the will of the world. Therefore, strictly speaking, the will to pursue the interests of the inner group should not be replaced by the comprehensive will of the state. This is why the Korean prosecution was concerned about my grouping. If the interests of the internal group or partial interests are excessively considered at the level of the sensuous and thoughtless public, the overall interests (national interests) are damaged. If someone has that perspective, he or she is not qualified as a leader.

 

If a political dispute turns into a confrontation between the inner group and the inner group, who raises the cow (who does the job of the state)