The origin of Chinese nationalism

It is not to say that there is a problem with friendly relations between China and DPRK(North Korea). The Chinese government once mentioned the "differences" of external forces as it improved relations with North Korea. It is right that the relationship between China and North Korea is strong. And what is pure is right.

 

China is talking about socialist alliances, but China is a country where nationalism encompasses socialism. Since my parents lived in North Korea and North Korea was one with South Korea until 74 years ago, it is right to have an independent personality away from foreign interference. And it needs to be rebuilt. However, anyone would expect that China's nationalism would not be very harmonious with China's relations with North Korea.

 

There was a time when there was no reason to talk about Chinese nationalism. The era of Deng Xiaoping and Zhou Enlai was "everyone" predicting the possibility of China becoming a world country. However, in this fundamental world of national thought, "everyone" acknowledges that there is a strong movement to return to the past.

 

Modern Western ideas are ideas that emerged after the Renaissance that reformed the gloomy religious standard of the Middle Ages. The same is true of communist ideas that China has yet to abandon. The Christian idea of the West was a globalist idea that believed in monotheism. And humanistic ideas, scientific ideas and liberal ideas that arose from the reform of Christian thought were bound to be at least more open and liberal than Christian ideas of the time.

https://hyeong-chun.blogspot.com/search?q=%EB%AA%A8%ED%83%9D%EB%8F%99

https://hyeong-chun.blogspot.com/search?q=Mao+Zedong

Although mentioned several times, Mao committed the fallacy of returning to feudalism despite his success in the communist revolution. It has been mentioned several times that Mao Zedong had a problem with his classical reading habits. Modern Chinese leaders should not follow Mao's ideas without criticism. The ideas contained in the classics Mao Zedong read a lot are those created during China's chaotic times. There is no idea of globalism in it, and there is no idea of equality. There is always a king and there is a power struggle between the state and the state.

 

In the Spring and Autumn Warring States Period, many countries accepted various "Hundred Schools of Thought" as national ideologies for survival. Some countries accepted Confucius' and Mencius' ideas of stability and welfare, while others claimed passive survival with small and small nations and enemies, and others called Chin, who unified the Spring and Autumn Warring States era by claiming wealth. Mao Zedong's role as a medium for accepting the governance technology of the "Chin" country contained in classics containing such ideas into modern Chinese ideas is thought to have been great.

 

In fact, most countries insist on rich countries (rich countries and strong armies), but behind them are bound by the idea of globalism and human co-prosperity. Of course China seems to be trying to do otherwise or not.